Faith Without Reason

thomaswhitley:

This morning at my church some of our children sang and some read lines. The performance was…well, it was a performance. Part of the dialogue stuck out to me, though.

Child 1: How could the creator of the world love me that much? I just can’t wrap my head around it.

Child 2: Thankfully, you don’t have to. You just have to wrap your heart around it.

This says to me that faith isn’t rational, that reason should not be considered when it comes to matters of faith.Should we not, though, be required to give some reason for our belief? I’m know that many will say that if you can give reasons for it, then it isn’t faith. To those, I would offer that maybe our definition of faith should be reconsidered.

W. K. Clifford says that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for any one, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.” (W. K. Clifford, “The Ethics of Belief”)

It occurs to me that this time of year is an exceptional time to ask this question as many people across our country are either gearing up to celebrate their special holiday (be it Christmas, Hanukkah or Kwanzaa) or are already thick in celebration. What we celebrate largely depends on what we believe, but where do our beliefs come from? Have we just accepted what others have told us to believe? Have we examined our reasons for believing? Should we even worry with reasons?

What do you think?

Untitled

With apologies to fans of Kings of Leon and Bon Iver, here are the top 10 rock albums of the year.

The Associated Press: The top 10 rock albums of 2008

Faith Without Reason

thomaswhitley:

This morning at my church some of our children sang and some read lines. The performance was…well, it was a performance. Part of the dialogue stuck out to me, though.

Child 1: How could the creator of the world love me that much? I just can’t wrap my head around it.

Child 2: Thankfully, you don’t have to. You just have to wrap your heart around it.

This says to me that faith isn’t rational, that reason should not be considered when it comes to matters of faith.Should we not, though, be required to give some reason for our belief? I’m know that many will say that if you can give reasons for it, then it isn’t faith. To those, I would offer that maybe our definition of faith should be reconsidered.

W. K. Clifford says that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for any one, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.” (W. K. Clifford, “The Ethics of Belief”)

It occurs to me that this time of year is an exceptional time to ask this question as many people across our country are either gearing up to celebrate their special holiday (be it Christmas, Hanukkah or Kwanzaa) or are already thick in celebration. What we celebrate largely depends on what we believe, but where do our beliefs come from? Have we just accepted what others have told us to believe? Have we examined our reasons for believing? Should we even worry with reasons?

What do you think?

MyBlogLog’s Failure and the Problem with Marketers

A0191490-5AA8-4EFF-AD9F-063589115AB1.jpg

My pal Angel Djambazov of ReveNews has a great post on his frustrations with the MyBlogLog platform and its incessant spam problem.

I offer up a few thoughts about why and how this could be resolved in the comments there (basically, the model of MBL is flawed and that’s why Twitter is the winner).

Some from Angel:

MyBlogLog Needs to Wake Up Their Porn Problem | ReveNews: “MyBlogLog has all the elements of a really great tool. Blog owners, especially those whose content is more news orientated, will find the oversight that allows these spammers in as a poor reflection on their community.

Yahoo needs to realize that in certain cases a picture can equal a thousand words of spam. Until then actual readers can get their news and their g-string pictures at the same time.”

And some from me:

“That’s why I think Twitter and the platforms that have been made popular since MBL was sold to Yahoo back in ‘07 have done so well (especially for those of us in the marketing space)… it’s the publisher or user who gets to be the gatekeeper and fend off the spammers as they arise. The follow/no-follow/block paradigm is much better than the wild-west mentality of MBL.”

Good convo going on there… head over to ReveNews and add some of your thoughts.