Fun time this afternoon at the annual Wofford vs Furman football game! Merianna (a Furman grad) was foolish enough to marry me at Wofford 12 years ago in Mickel Chapel at Wofford. Rev. Skinner would be proud that all of our children pull for the Old Gold and Black!
You don’t have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
-Ray Bradbury
One of those amazing thinkers and scholars who helped shape my own theological journey (first read her work as an Undergrad at Wofford College, and it both answered and provoked questions I had been and continue to wrestle with), along with countless others.
Her work on rhetorical criticism and the book of Jonah is still one of my favorites and a must-read.
Union Theological Seminary: In Memoriam: Dr. Phyllis Trible
Dr. Trible’s scholarship reshaped biblical studies, insisting that the academy and the church confront both the beauty and the brutality of our sacred texts.
Through groundbreaking works—including God and the Rhetoric of Sexuality and Texts of Terror—she taught generations to read with literary rigor, ethical clarity, and courageous empathy. Her method of close rhetorical reading opened space for women and other marginalized people long silenced by interpretive traditions, and her teaching formed scholars, pastors, and activists who carry her insights into pulpits, classrooms, and movements for justice around the world.
Great podcast episode here with the incredible Helen Bond and the always insightful Mark Goodacre, who may or may not have been a listener of Thinking Religion in the Thomas Whitley era…
Since the mid-twentieth century, it has been routine for scholars to see John as independent of the Synoptics – Matthew, Mark and Luke. Yet a recent book by Professor Mark Goodacre suggests that John should be read as the fourth and final ‘Synoptic’ gospel which knew and used all of the Synoptics. Join Helen and Lloyd in the Biblical Time Machine as they explore Goodacre’s case. Learn about John’s dramatic transformation of the Synoptics, the way his Gospel ‘presupposes’ the earlier texts, and the payoff of Goodacre’s argument for John’s authorship and date.
is Professor of New Testament and Christian Origins in the Religious Studies Department at Duke University, North Carolina. He is the author of the classic volumes: The Case Against Q (2002) and Thomas and the Gospels (2012). His most recent book, fresh off the press, is (Eerdmans, 2025),
Fascinating new info…
Hominins suffered lead poisoning starting at least 2 million years ago – Ars Technica:
Lead exposure sounds like a modern problem, at least if you define “modern” the way a paleoanthropologist might: a time that started a few thousand years ago with ancient Roman silver smelting and lead pipes. According to a recent study, however, lead is a much more ancient nemesis, one that predates not just the Romans but the existence of our genus Homo. Paleoanthropologist Renaud Joannes-Boyau of Australia’s Southern Cross University and his colleagues found evidence of exposure to dangerous amounts of lead in the teeth of fossil apes and hominins dating back almost 2 million years. And somewhat controversially, they suggest that the toxic element’s pervasiveness may have helped shape our evolutionary history…
…But perhaps its most interesting feature is that modern humans have a version of the gene that differs by a single amino acid from the version found in all other primates, including our closest relatives, the Denisovans and Neanderthals. This raises the prospect that the difference is significant from an evolutionary perspective. Altering the mouse version so that it is identical to the one found in modern humans does alter the vocal behavior of these mice.
www.reddit.com/r/sports/s/fBTCyMhaNh
I kind of love it.
I know there have been various takes on the Black Rhino bond from 2022 and the long-term outcomes there, but I’m still fascinated (from a philosophical and theological point of view) about these types of mechanisms and initiatives… says a good deal about our Human response to challenges and opportunities that I need to explore more in my research!
Invasive plants bond, biodiversity fund mulled for South Africa – Moneyweb:
As the world looks for ways to curb biodiversity loss, new financial tools are being developed to fund the preservation and restoration of ecosystems. They include swapping sovereign debt for lower-interest bonds, with the savings directed to conservation, and selling instruments that pay investors when targets — such as increases in endangered animal populations — are met.
The Nature Conservancy, a US-based conservation nonprofit, is working with Johannesburg-based Rand Merchant Bank to explore the sale of a biodiversity outcomes bond, Kerry Purnell, a conservation manager for the TNC, said in an interview. Investors will earn returns based on targets for clearing invasive vegetation in the water catchment area around Cape Town being met.
How am I just now reading this?? I should OF read it years ago as a teacher…
Would of, could of, might of, must of | Sentence first:
Unstressed ’ve is phonetically identical (/əv/) to unstressed of: hence the widespread misspellings would of, could of, should of, must of, might of, may of, and ought to of. Negative forms also appear: shouldn’t of, mightn’t of, etc. This explanation – that misanalysis of the notorious schwa lies behind the error – has general support among linguists.
In the context of notebooks (also my favorite being Field Notes that I use almost religiously… and I don’t take that adjective lightly), but also my experience as a 47-year-old rounding the bases…
You should absolutely buy that stupid thing:
Let this be a lesson: you should absolutely buy that stupid thing you want to buy on a whim. It will totally work out.
New alarming study out about the many problems with biofuels and why solar would be a much much better option for local communities and global megacorps to employ…
Biofuels globally emit more CO2 than the fossil fuels they… | T&E:
Global biofuels production emits 16% more CO2 than the fossil fuels it replaces, a new Cerulogy report on behalf of T&E shows. The same land could feed 1.3 billion people, while using just 3% of that land for solar panels would produce the same amount of energy. With demand set to rise by at least 40% by 2030, T&E calls for global leaders meeting in Brazil for COP30 to agree to limit the expansion of a climate solution that is doing more harm than good.
