I’m talking about plasma and ecology a little more… there’s a lot here that needs to be explored.
Abstract
This paper develops the concept of Integral Plasma Ecology as a framework that bridges physics, cosmology, and ecological theology through a process-relational lens. Drawing from Alfred North Whitehead’s cosmology, Teilhard de Chardin’s evolutionary mysticism, and Thomas Berry’s integral ecology, I propose that plasma, the most abundant and least understood state of matter in the cosmos, can serve as a metaphysical and theological metaphor for participatory consciousness and relational ecology. My background in physics education informs this exploration, as I integrate scientific understandings of plasma’s dynamics with phenomenological and theological insights from Merleau-Ponty, Edith Stein, and Leonardo Boff. The result is a vision of reality as a living field of plasma-like relationality, charged with energy, consciousness, and divine creativity.
Introduction: From Physics to Ecology
Teaching AP Physics for more than a decade invited me to teach the universe’s foundational structures of motion, fields, and forces. I taught students how energy moves through systems, how charge generates fields, and how the visible world depends on invisible relations. Yet it was through my doctoral work in ecology and religion that these physical insights deepened into theological questions. What if these energetic relationships are not merely physical but also metaphysical? What if the cosmos itself is an ecological process of becoming, an ever-living plasma of divine relation?
As Whitehead writes, “the energetic activity considered in physics is the emotional intensity entertained in life” (Whitehead 1978, 113). This simple but profound statement reframes matter not as inert but as alive with feeling. Physics thus becomes a spiritual ecology and a study of how creativity courses through the veins of the universe.
In this paper, I build on that insight, proposing that plasma, the ionized, dynamic, relational state of matter, embodies the ontological structure of reality described by process philosophy and integral ecology. Plasma is the medium of creation: relational, dynamic, self-organizing, and luminous. It is the cosmos’ own ecology.
Plasma: The Fourth State of Matter as First Principle
Plasma constitutes over 99% of the visible universe (Peratt 1992, 4). From stars to nebulae, from lightning to auroras, plasma bridges energy and matter, revealing that the cosmos is not built of solid bodies but of dynamic, interpenetrating fields. In a plasma, electrons and ions exist in constant tension as an interplay of attraction and repulsion, order and chaos.
As a physics teacher, I explained plasma to students as “a soup of charged particles,” but even that language undersells its mystery. Plasma self-organizes into filaments and double layers, forming intricate networks that resemble neural or ecological systems. This self-organization without central control challenges the Newtonian image of matter as passive substance. It invites metaphysical reflection: perhaps plasma is a cosmological icon of relational being and a physical analogue for what theologians call the divine pleroma, or fullness of life.
Teilhard de Chardin’s The Phenomenon of Man anticipated this perspective when he described matter as “spirit-in-evolution,” energized from within by a divine impetus (Teilhard 1959, 56). Plasma, as the living medium of the universe, may represent that very process as matter suffused by its own luminous consciousness.
Process and Participation: Whitehead, Cobb, and Berry
In Whitehead’s process cosmology, the universe is composed not of things but of events or occasions of experience that prehend one another in an ongoing flow of creativity (Whitehead 1978). Energy is not something added to matter but the form of its feeling. Plasma, then, is not simply physical energy but a processual manifestation of relational creativity with the universe becoming itself through fields of feeling or being or perception.
John Cobb, a key interpreter of Whitehead, extends this insight into ecological theology, arguing that “God and the world are relationally co-creative; the world participates in God’s creative advance” (Cobb 1985, 87). This participation, like plasma dynamics, is nonlinear, chaotic, and interdependent. There is no static center; instead, reality unfolds through relational patterns of mutual influence.
Thomas Berry’s call for an “integral ecology” resonates deeply here. In The Great Work, Berry envisions the universe as a single, living communion of subjects rather than a collection of objects (Berry 1999, 16). The plasma universe offers a tangible vision of that communion: everything is charged, in motion, and co-creating. Energy and consciousness are not separate categories but expressions of the same cosmic pulse.
Phenomenology and the Plasma of Perception
Turning from cosmology to phenomenology, Merleau-Ponty and Edith Stein offer complementary perspectives on relational being. For Merleau-Ponty, perception is “an intertwining, a flesh of the world” (Merleau-Ponty 1968, 147). This “flesh” is not simply physical matter but a relational medium, much like plasma, that binds perceiver and perceived in a dynamic exchange.
Stein, in On the Problem of Empathy, describes consciousness as fundamentally participatory: to know another is to “live into” them, to resonate with their inner life (Stein 1989, 11). In plasma terms, empathy is the transfer of charge across a relational field. Consciousness is an electro-phenomenological event, where selves co-arise through interaction.
This phenomenological perspective reframes plasma as existential metaphor. The cosmos itself perceives, or feels, through its fields. Every charged particle participates in the world’s ongoing self-awareness. Thus, Integral Plasma Ecology posits that ecological consciousness is not uniquely human but cosmic, woven into the plasma fabric of being.
Integral Theory and the Ecology of Energy
The term “integral” situates this framework within the lineage of integral thinkers such as Ken Wilber, Sri Aurobindo, and Jean Gebser, who each envisioned reality as a multidimensional, evolving whole. In Wilber’s AQAL model (all quadrants, all levels), energy and consciousness co-evolve across developmental lines (Wilber 2000, 44). Plasma, as both physical and metaphysical energy, bridges those quadrants—interior and exterior, individual and collective.
In Integral Plasma Ecology, plasma functions as an integrative metaphor and ontological medium. It unites:
- Physical energy (electromagnetic fields, thermodynamics)
- Biological life (ecological flows and feedbacks)
- Spiritual consciousness (divine creativity and relational presence)
This integration reflects Teilhard’s noosphere where the emergence of collective consciousness through the energetic evolution of matter. Humanity’s ecological crises, then, are not merely environmental but energetic dissonances within the plasma field of creation. Our technologies, economies, and even theologies have disrupted the cosmic charge balance.
Toward an Integral Plasma Ecology
Building on these traditions, I define Integral Plasma Ecology as:
“A participatory framework for understanding energy, consciousness, and ecology as manifestations of a single, relational plasma of creativity.”
Its key premises are:
- Ontological Continuity: Matter, life, and mind are phases of the same energetic continuum.
- Relational Primacy: Reality is constituted by relations, not substances.
- Participatory Consciousness: Perception and energy exchange are coextensive phenomena.
- Integral Practice: Healing the ecological crisis requires rebalancing our energetic and spiritual relations with the cosmos.
From the ionosphere to the biosphere, plasma organizes itself through feedback loops that mirror ecological networks. Lightning, solar flares, and auroras become more than meteorological curiosities, and they are expressions of what could be considered planetary consciousness.
In this sense, the Earth’s magnetosphere is a form of cosmic empathy, or a membrane that translates solar energy into life-giving patterns. The planet participates in the cosmic plasma dance, filtering chaos into order, radiation into rhythm.
Theological Implications: The Cross and the Charge
For me, the cross serves as a central symbol for this plasma cosmology. In my ongoing work on The Ecology of the Cross, I have proposed that the cross represents not only human suffering but the interpenetration of divine and cosmic energies. In a plasma field, positive and negative charges continually intersect, annihilate, and generate light. Likewise, the cross signifies the intersection of divine transcendence and immanent materiality and creation’s own plasma arc.
As Whitehead puts it, “God is the poet of the world, with tender patience leading it by his vision of truth, beauty, and goodness” (Whitehead 1978, 346). The divine presence, like an electromagnetic field, permeates creation, luring it toward harmony. Yet, as plasma reminds us, equilibrium arises not from stasis but from dynamic tension. The divine is not separate from chaos but works through it.
In this view, Christ’s crucifixion becomes a cosmic event: the discharge of divine energy into the plasma of existence, reconciling opposites and igniting the potential for renewal. Integral Plasma Ecology thus extends Christology into a cosmotheandric ecology when and where God, cosmos, and humanity participate in one charged field of becoming (Panikkar 1993, 58).
Ecological Ethics in a Plasma Universe
If the cosmos is a plasma ecology, then ethics must shift from dominion to participation. Every act, every thought, emission, or prayer, sends ripples through the field. Leonardo Boff’s Cry of the Earth, Cry of the Poor emphasizes that ecological healing depends on recovering our “mystical sense of communion with the universe” (Boff 1997, 67). Plasma theology radicalizes that claim: communion is not symbolic but ontological.
To pollute a river is to alter the energetic balance of the planet; to pray beside it is to restore resonance. Our responsibility is not to manage nature as resource but to resonate with it as fellow participant. This echoes Berry’s notion of the “Great Work” and the transformation of human presence from disruption to participation (Berry 1999, 105).
In educational terms, teaching physics or ecology becomes a spiritual practice. Students learn not only equations but energetic empathy with an awareness that to study energy is to encounter the divine flow itself.
Integrating Pedagogy: Teaching the Plasma Universe
In the classroom, I once drew magnetic field lines on the board, showing how charges move in loops rather than straight lines. Now I see that lesson differently. Those loops are metaphors for relational return to the continual circulation of divine energy through matter and consciousness.
An integral pedagogy of plasma would invite students to see science and spirituality not as opposites but as complementary ways of tracing those loops. Using laboratory experiments, like plasma globes or Van de Graaff generators, can become invitations to wonder at the living electricity of creation.
As David Bohm argued, the universe is a “holomovement,” a continuous enfolding and unfolding of energy and meaning (Bohm 1980, 48). Teaching within that paradigm transforms education into ecological initiation: a way of learning to dwell consciously in the plasma field of being.
Conclusion: The Luminous Communion
Integral Plasma Ecology reimagines reality as a luminous communion of charged relations. It bridges physics and theology, matter and mind, offering a cosmological language for our age of ecological crisis. It invites us to live as participants in the plasma field and to sense the divine energy pulsing through trees, storms, and starlight.
As Berry wrote, “The universe is not a collection of objects, but a communion of subjects” (Berry 1999, 16). In plasma, that communion shines visibly as the very light of the world is the glow of relation.
To dwell in that light is our calling, our work, and our joy.
References
Berry, Thomas. The Great Work: Our Way into the Future. New York: Bell Tower, 1999.
Boff, Leonardo. Cry of the Earth, Cry of the Poor. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1997.
Bohm, David. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London: Routledge, 1980.
Cobb, John B. Process Theology as Political Theology. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1985.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1968.
Panikkar, Raimon. The Cosmotheandric Experience: Emerging Religious Consciousness. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1993.
Peratt, Anthony L. Physics of the Plasma Universe. New York: Springer, 1992.
Stein, Edith. On the Problem of Empathy. Washington, DC: ICS Publications, 1989.
Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre. The Phenomenon of Man. New York: Harper & Row, 1959.
Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York: Free Press, 1978.
Wilber, Ken. A Theory of Everything: An Integral Vision for Business, Politics, Science, and Spirituality. Boston: Shambhala, 2000.
